Bill
Committee Member

Post #11710
Joined: 21 Feb 2004
Posts: 411
Total Words: 42,715
Average words per post: 103.93
PoliMatch: n/a

|
Posted: Thu 2005-06-23 01:50
|
|
| Politics: X-tremely Silly Party |
Country: Airstrip One |
|
| Flag-Burning Amendment Advancing in U.S. House |
|
| From The Scotsman |
Flag-Burning Amendment Advancing in U.S. House
"PA"
The United States’ House of Representatives today moved towards approving a constitutional amendment that would give Congress the power to ban desecration of the American flag, a measure that for the first time stands a chance of passing the Senate as well.
Members of the House debated – as they have six times before – whether such a ban would uphold or run afoul of the Constitution’s free-speech protections.
Supporters said the measure reflected patriotism that deepened after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, and they accused detractors of being out of touch with public sentiment.
“Ask the men and women who stood on top of the (World) Trade Centre,” said Representative Randy Cunningham, a California Republican.
“Ask them and they will tell you: pass this amendment.”
But Representative Jerrold Nadler, a New York Democrat, said: “If the flag needs protection at all, it needs protection from members of Congress who value the symbol more than the freedoms that the flag represents.”
The measure was designed to overturn a 1989 decision by the Supreme Court, which ruled 5-4 that flag burning was a protected free-speech right. That ruling threw out a 1968 federal statute and flag-protection laws in 48 states.
The proposed one-line amendment to the Constitution reads: “The Congress shall have power to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the US.”
For the language to be added to the Constitution, it must be approved not only by two-thirds of each chamber but also by 38 states within seven years.
Each time the proposed amendment has come to the House floor, it has reached the required two-thirds majority. But the measure has always died in the Senate, falling short of the 67 votes needed. The last time the Senate took up the amendment was in 2000, when it failed 63-37.
But last year’s elections gave Republicans a four-seat increase in the Senate, and now proponents and critics alike say the amendment stands within a vote or two of reaching the two-thirds requirement in that chamber.
By most counts, 65 current senators have voted for or said they intend to support the amendment, two shy of the crucial tally. More than a quarter of current senators were not members of that chamber during the last vote.
The Senate is expected to consider the measure after the July 4th holiday
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Big Brother
Administrator

Post #11712
Joined: 14 Feb 2004
Posts: 2872
Total Words: 1,134,593
Average words per post: 395.05
PoliMatch: n/a
   
  
|
Posted: Thu 2005-06-23 16:14
|
|
| Politics: Libertarian-Syndicalist |
Country: American Empire |
|
| Holy Bullshit. |
|
I can't believe I didn't hear about this.
I think an e-mail to my Senator is in order.
The thing that disturbs me is that they call this the "Flag Burning Amendment". But that is not what the amendment says at all...
"The Congress shall have power to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United States" - proposed "flag burning" amendment.
Please observe -- It doesn't have the word "burning" anywhere in there. Instead, it prohibits "physical desecration". Well, what the fuck does that mean? The government's has a history trying to interpret constitutional provisions in ways different from what the writer's original intentions. (i.e. People who claim that the 2nd Amendment protects a state's right to have a militia, but does not protect individual rights.)
"In recent years it has been suggested that the Second Amendment protects the "collective" right of states to maintain militias, while it does not protect the right of "the people" to keep and bear arms. If anyone entertained this notion in the period during which the Constitution and the Bill of Rights were debated and ratified, it remains one of the most closely guarded secrets of the eighteenth century, for no known writing surviving from the period between 1787 and 1791 states such a thesis." - Stephen P. Halbrook, "That Every Man Be Armed", 1984
So I have to wonder how future courts might interpret this provision.
- If somebody leaves their flag out in the rain, will they now face jail time?
- What if you’re marching in a protest carrying a flag, and then you trip and fall – allowing the flag to touch the ground. Will the authorities immediately step in to throw the heretic into prison?
- What if a Marine or a politician is marching a parade and drops a flag on the ground. Will HE be arrested? (I doubt it.)
- Does spitting on a flag count as "desecration"? What about spitting on a person who is wearing a flag (such as a police officer or riot cop)
- Does this include giving the flag the "birdie"? (It is a "physical" act, after all.) What if you flip off a politician standing under a flag? Your “physical desecration” is being aimed in the same direction as the flag, so would that count?
- Does yelling "fuck you" count as physical desecration? If not, what if you accidentally spit while yelling it?
- Are you allowed to burn a virtual flag? Are you allowed to posses a photo of a flag being burned? What if you post the photo on the internet as a form of protest? Will the athorities come and take you away?
This amendment is just absurd and Americans really should be ashamed of themselves for even considering fucking with the 1st amendment in order to protect symbols of the state. It is an extremely dangerous precedent to set.
AFTERTHOUGHT – Actually, this might be a good thing. What if a person was to wrap himself up in a flag like a horror-show mummy? Would that prevent the police from beating you or throwing tear gas at you?
Nah… wearing a flag as clothing would probably count as “desecration” as well, so you’d probably just be arrested.
Here's another thought...
| From Flag Etiquette |
What is the proper way to dispose a flag?
In many American communities, one or more organizations (such as the American Legion) render an important community service by collecting and overseeing the proper disposal of old, worn, tattered, and/or frayed U.S. Flags. Some organizations make it an annual service project; others announce when and where Flags will be accepted. Often, community newspapers, radio, and TV stations help broadcast the availability of the service. Churches, synagogues, chambers of commerce, civic organizations, and businesses sometimes have served as "drop off" locations for the collection of worn flags. Any American Legion or local VFW can put you in contact with an approved disposal facility.
If many U.S. Flags are collected, it may be desirable to seek assistance from a corporate, government or military facility which maintains an incinerator or furnace that can readily burn the flags. According to the United State Flag Code 36s 176(k): "The flag, when it is in such condition that it is no longer a fitting emblem of display, should be destroyed in a dignified way, preferably by burning." This burning occurs during a formal ceremony conducted by an approved flag disposal organization.
|
Now I’m really confused. _________________ "First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." - Mahatma Gandhi
"It is often argued that religion is valuable because it makes men good, but even if this were true it would not be a proof that religion is true. That would be an extension of pragmatism beyond endurance. Santa Claus makes children good in precisely the same way, and yet no one would argue seriously that the fact proves his existence. The defense of religion is full of such logical imbecilities." - H. L. Mencken
"The Aim of an Argument ... should not be victory, but progress." - Joseph Joubert (1754-1824)
http://freeme.tv |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
APCP
Outer Party

Post #11716
Joined: 26 Feb 2004
Posts: 189
Total Words: 30,837
Average words per post: 163.16
PoliMatch: n/a
 
|
Posted: Thu 2005-06-23 21:58
|
|
| Politics: Anarchist |
Country: Springfield |
|
| |
|
So far, I've burned 6 U.S. flags, and pissed on one while it was on fire to further disrespect it. The piss put it out and made it stiff and impossible to relight, so I had to throw it away, still...
And BB, I don't think an email to your senator's going to fix anything. I'd say what I'd think would fix it, but until I can be assured that no dickless government assholes visit this site, I'm just going to shut the fuck up. They go after our guns, our movies, our protests, our thoughts, even our own fucking video games. WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON? DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY GOD DAMN BALLS TO STAND UP AND DO SOMETHING? No wonder we're in such a shit hole now, we've spent our whole fucking lives wasting away at the tv, or just too dickless to do anything. Shit doesn't fix itself. I'm fucking sick of seeing these god damn flags every five seconds, or hearing that video games lead to killings. TRAMPING ON OUR FUCKING RIGHTS LEADS TO KILLINGS. Fuck America, fuck the British, fuck these religious backward hillbillies and towel heads, fuck everyone.  _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Big Brother
Administrator

Post #11718
Joined: 14 Feb 2004
Posts: 2872
Total Words: 1,134,593
Average words per post: 395.05
PoliMatch: n/a
   
  
|
Posted: Thu 2005-06-23 22:34
|
|
| Politics: Libertarian-Syndicalist |
Country: American Empire |
|
| Learn to Swim |
|
| Anarchist Pride wrote: |
| So far, I've burned 6 U.S. flags, and pissed on one while it was on fire to further disrespect it. The piss put it out and made it stiff and impossible to relight, so I had to throw it away, still... |
Next time... drink a lot of Everclear. That should help make it a little more flammable.
| Anarchist Pride wrote: |
And BB, I don't think an email to your senator's going to fix anything.
|
No, but it's a good start. Of course the Senator will never read most of the thousands of e-mails he receives, but his office does keep statistics on what the e-mails say. And if a senator gets 2,000 e-mails supporting a new law, but 10,000 e-mails opposing it, it may cause him to re-think an issue. It's a long shot, but occasionally, it can be an effective one.
Of course, standing at the foot of capital hill burning flags may be a more effective form of protest. But really, that would probably only hurt your own cause.
Hmmm.. a better tactics might be to produce commercials showing people getting arrested for some of the frivolous reasons that I posted above.
...people getting arrested for "desecrating" a flag by dropping it on the ground or leaving it outside in the rain...
...newspaper reporters being arrested for re-printingan image of a flag being burned...
...Nazi's busting down your door and taking you away because you "desecrated" the holy symbol of our land by not standing up at a baseball game and singing the national anthem. (Thanks to Face-Recognition Software and our nation's new National ID database, it's a simple job for the state to track down these un-patriotic assholes.)
| Anarchist Pride wrote: |
I'd say what I'd think would fix it, but until I can be assured that no dickless government assholes visit this site, I'm just going to shut the fuck up.
|
Is Big Brother watching big Brother? I think we've already discussed this before when I listed all of the hits I received from government domains.
(Of course, that list primarily consisted of fairly lame agencies such as the California Dept of Forestry and Fire Protection and the Columbus Ohio City Government…. Not much to fear there.)
| Anarchist Pride wrote: |
Fuck America, fuck the British, fuck these religious backward hillbillies and towel heads, fuck everyone.  |
Learn to Swim... _________________ "First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." - Mahatma Gandhi
"It is often argued that religion is valuable because it makes men good, but even if this were true it would not be a proof that religion is true. That would be an extension of pragmatism beyond endurance. Santa Claus makes children good in precisely the same way, and yet no one would argue seriously that the fact proves his existence. The defense of religion is full of such logical imbecilities." - H. L. Mencken
"The Aim of an Argument ... should not be victory, but progress." - Joseph Joubert (1754-1824)
http://freeme.tv |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cthulhuvong
Spy

Post #11720
Joined: 20 Apr 2005
Posts: 99
Total Words: 13,667
Average words per post: 138.05
PoliMatch: n/a
|
Posted: Fri 2005-06-24 04:59
|
|
| Politics: Outer Party |
Country: Coruscant |
|
| |
|
I sent e-mails to my Senators, though it doesn't really matter. I can tell you right now that Illinois' senators Barak Obama and Dick Durbin (who just got in trouble for saying Gitmo was like Nazi death camps) are gonna be against this. So that 2 out of 100 you know are against this. Its not much, but its something.
I've never burned a flag. I still agree people have the right to do so in protest. I may hate some people for doing it (like if they say its because they hate every American and wish they would all die), but I'll still give them the right. Even if this doesn't pass, the police and feds still have ways to get you like "public endangerment" because the flag could start other fires or hurt someone else. And a ton of other laws.
I do like the commercial idea. Get MoveOn.org to do that, they love making commercials.
Fundies are fun to argue with in debates, but hard as hell to fight anywhere else. I'm so happy I live in one of only 3 blue counties in my state (and yet we're a blue state, strange no?). _________________ "Being a freedom fighter, a force for good, its a wonderful thing...you get to make your own hours, looks good on a resume, but the pay...sucks." ~ Bester, Babylon 5
"The only bad "f-word" is FCC." ~ Tom Morello on censorship
"Mcdonalds.....mmmmm...corporate evil..…" ~ Jenny Lieu, my girlfriend
Polish proverb: Under capitalism man exploits man; under socialism the reverse is true. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Big Brother
Administrator

Post #11727
Joined: 14 Feb 2004
Posts: 2872
Total Words: 1,134,593
Average words per post: 395.05
PoliMatch: n/a
   
  
|
Posted: Sat 2005-06-25 04:03
|
|
| Politics: Libertarian-Syndicalist |
Country: American Empire |
|
| |
|
| Cthulhuvong wrote: |
I sent e-mails to my Senators, though it doesn't really matter. I can tell you right now that Illinois' senators Barak Obama and Dick Durbin (who just got in trouble for saying Gitmo was like Nazi death camps) are gonna be against this. So that 2 out of 100 you know are against this. Its not much, but its something.
|
Ahh.. A fellow Illinoisian. (Is that a word?)
| Cthulhuvong wrote: |
I've never burned a flag.
|
Neither have I. But, like I said... the amendment is not limited to just "burning" a flag. Any act that can be considered "physical desecration" could possibly land you in prison... even "virtual desecration", such as posting an image of a flag being burned on a website. And do the folowing images count as "desecrating"?....
Remind me to come back to this page and remove these images if this amendment passes. I don't need federal agents kicking down my door and running off with my servers.
 _________________ "First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." - Mahatma Gandhi
"It is often argued that religion is valuable because it makes men good, but even if this were true it would not be a proof that religion is true. That would be an extension of pragmatism beyond endurance. Santa Claus makes children good in precisely the same way, and yet no one would argue seriously that the fact proves his existence. The defense of religion is full of such logical imbecilities." - H. L. Mencken
"The Aim of an Argument ... should not be victory, but progress." - Joseph Joubert (1754-1824)
http://freeme.tv |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cthulhuvong
Spy

Post #11745
Joined: 20 Apr 2005
Posts: 99
Total Words: 13,667
Average words per post: 138.05
PoliMatch: n/a
|
Posted: Sun 2005-06-26 01:00
|
|
| Politics: Outer Party |
Country: Coruscant |
|
| |
|
| Quote: |
| Ahh.. A fellow Illinoisian. (Is that a word?) |
It is now. Thats what I say, nothing else sounds right.
| Quote: |
| And do the folowing images count as "desecrating"? |
Definately yes. The Adbusters Corperate flag is definately a desecration. A guy I know from another forum whos the "true blue patriotic Christian American" (and a Marine reservist to boot) thought it was a disgusting mockary of the flag when he saw it, or something like that.
| Quote: |
| Remind me to come back to this page and remove these images if this amendment passes. I don't need federal agents kicking down my door and running off with my servers. |
And they'd do it too. The shut down a free radio station a while back (free meaning no comercials, and no licensing from the FCC) and took all their equipment. The town was pissed, since everyone there liked it. _________________ "Being a freedom fighter, a force for good, its a wonderful thing...you get to make your own hours, looks good on a resume, but the pay...sucks." ~ Bester, Babylon 5
"The only bad "f-word" is FCC." ~ Tom Morello on censorship
"Mcdonalds.....mmmmm...corporate evil..…" ~ Jenny Lieu, my girlfriend
Polish proverb: Under capitalism man exploits man; under socialism the reverse is true. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tyrant
Outer Party

Post #11749
Joined: 21 Mar 2005
Posts: 158
Total Words: 11,654
Average words per post: 73.76
PoliMatch: n/a

|
Posted: Sun 2005-06-26 01:46
|
|
| Politics: Libertarian-Capitalist |
Country: Canada |
|
| yikes |
|
While I'm not American, I guess people should be able to burn flags if they'd like. I dont see it as a big priority to crack down on. I think, though, that sometimes police intervention in flag burning is neccesary simply because its a public disturbance. People really shouldn't be burning anything in the streets, for example.
But as Big Brother states, the main issue is what is objectively defined as "desecration". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Big Brother
Administrator

Post #11754
Joined: 14 Feb 2004
Posts: 2872
Total Words: 1,134,593
Average words per post: 395.05
PoliMatch: n/a
   
  
|
Posted: Sun 2005-06-26 07:24
|
|
| Politics: Libertarian-Syndicalist |
Country: American Empire |
|
| Re: yikes |
|
| Tyrant wrote: |
While I'm not American, I guess people should be able to burn flags if they'd like. I don’t see it as a big priority to crack down on. I think, though, that sometimes police intervention in flag burning is necessary simply because its a public disturbance. People really shouldn't be burning anything in the streets, for example.
|
Good point. The whole "flag burning" thing can be stopped by way of a simple city ordinance against starting fires on public property. I think a lot of cities already have such a law on the books anyway.
But the only down side to this is that the punishment probably isn't all that harsh... a small fine most likely. And such laws deny federal agents the pleasure of locking up dissenters in prison.
| Tyrant wrote: |
But as Big Brother states, the main issue is what is objectively defined as "desecration". |
The whole purpose is to provide an avenue for the feds to crack down on dissent.
But really, this amendment will be wholly ineffective at cracking down on its intended target -- people who burn flags. All the "burners" have to do is slightly modify the flags that they plan on burning. (i.e. A flag with only 49 stars is not the "official" flag of the United States, so one would think that it would be legal to use it as kindling.)
I mean, would it be legal to burn a flag that has been desecrated in such a way to make it not the American flag?
Are they desecrating a desecrated American flag, or are they just burning a meaningless piece of cloth?
I'm confused.
The more I think about it, the more ridiculous this whole thing becomes. The only reason a politician would vote for this thing is because he knows that if he votes against it, his opponents in the next election will beat him over the head with his decision and run ads which call him a "friend of the flag burners". There is no other reason to vote for this thing. None what-so-ever. (Except, of course, if you're the type of person that just doesn't like the first amendment to begin with.) _________________ "First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." - Mahatma Gandhi
"It is often argued that religion is valuable because it makes men good, but even if this were true it would not be a proof that religion is true. That would be an extension of pragmatism beyond endurance. Santa Claus makes children good in precisely the same way, and yet no one would argue seriously that the fact proves his existence. The defense of religion is full of such logical imbecilities." - H. L. Mencken
"The Aim of an Argument ... should not be victory, but progress." - Joseph Joubert (1754-1824)
http://freeme.tv |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
minister of love
Committee Member

Post #11931
Joined: 22 Feb 2005
Posts: 273
Total Words: 38,433
Average words per post: 140.78
PoliMatch: n/a
|
Posted: Tue 2005-07-05 23:29
|
|
| Politics: Oligarchical Collectivist |
Country: Antarctica |
|
| A Word From The Dickless Government Asshole |
|
Hi, I'm the dickless government asshole who monitors this site, logs IP and e-mail addresses, etc.
BB, I think you went a little off the deep end in your first post in this thread. While I don't have an opinion either way about the whole flag-burning thing, did you ever notice that sand-niggers love to be seen on TV burning an American flag? Did you ever wonder why it's such a big deal to them? Do you remember all the SHIT we got over American prison guards "mistreating" a fucking book that belonged to an enemy combatant of the US? I'd like to flush every koran in the world down a toilet after I shit diarehha on it.
Is symbolism important? Hell, when has it ever NOT been important in the history of humanity? I don't believe in free speach if it is reckless or abused, which it often is in this country. This is also the only large country that allows free speach. Did that fact just escape everyone's attention?
We just celebrated our declaration of independance from Britian. Most people in the world have no real understanding of what it means to be an American. Things that we take for granted are totally foriegn to most people in the world. They tend to be more tied to tradition that we are. Maybe that's why we enjoy hte highest standard of living and the largest economy and most powerful military in the world. Who knows?
Arguing against any laws restricting treatment of our national flag, I believe in the American sentiment, "live free or die". On the other hand, eventhough our society is very prudish in many ways, many people in the world consider Americans to be uncivilized and lacking in refinment. The typical American response to those sentiments is, "Fuck You", so maybe they're right.
I have a towel of the American flag and a pair of swimming trunks made of Flag material also. If I pee in the pool or wipe my ass with the towel after I bathe, am I desicrating the flag?
BB, I guess I agree with you that this is a bad amendment. But I also wanted to point out that desicrating one's national flag or holy book or any other number of objects IS illegal in most countries. So, if we're expected to treat an Afgany's Koran withthe proper respect, isn't it reasonable to expect them to treat our national symbols with equivilant respect? Maybe the wording of the amendment is too vague. I think that only Americans should have hte right to desicrate our Flag and we should seek out and kill any foriegners who do so. Doesn't that sound more reasonable? _________________ You know what is in room 101...Everyone knows. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Big Brother
Administrator

Post #11934
Joined: 14 Feb 2004
Posts: 2872
Total Words: 1,134,593
Average words per post: 395.05
PoliMatch: n/a
   
  
|
Posted: Wed 2005-07-06 00:48
|
|
| Politics: Libertarian-Syndicalist |
Country: American Empire |
|
| Re: A Word From The Dickless Government Asshole |
|
| minister of love wrote: |
Hi, I'm the dickless government asshole who monitors this site, logs IP and e-mail addresses, etc.
|
I knew they were watching me!... I Just knew it! They’ve probably already bugged my house, too!
| minister of love wrote: |
I have a towel of the American flag and a pair of swimming trunks made of Flag material also. If I pee in the pool or wipe my ass with the towel after I bathe, am I desecrating the flag?
|
Yes. I assume that what a "flag burning" amendment will do is make violations of the U.S. Flag code a punishable offense. If so, your star-spangled Speedos just might earn you a trip to sing-sing.
| minister of love wrote: |
BB, I guess I agree with you that this is a bad amendment. But I also wanted to point out that desecrating one's national flag or holy book or any other number of objects IS illegal in most countries. So, if we're expected to treat an Afgany's Koran with the proper respect, isn't it reasonable to expect them to treat our national symbols with equivalent respect. Maybe the wording of the amendment is too vague. I think that only Americans should have the right to desecrate our Flag and we should seek out and kill any foreigners who do so. Doesn't that sound more reasonable?
|
I suppose.
But I just had a thought... I wonder how many other countries have laws against "desecrating" national symbols... I wonder what types of countries would have such a law... anybody want to take a guess? _________________ "First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." - Mahatma Gandhi
"It is often argued that religion is valuable because it makes men good, but even if this were true it would not be a proof that religion is true. That would be an extension of pragmatism beyond endurance. Santa Claus makes children good in precisely the same way, and yet no one would argue seriously that the fact proves his existence. The defense of religion is full of such logical imbecilities." - H. L. Mencken
"The Aim of an Argument ... should not be victory, but progress." - Joseph Joubert (1754-1824)
http://freeme.tv |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
minister of love
Committee Member

Post #11947
Joined: 22 Feb 2005
Posts: 273
Total Words: 38,433
Average words per post: 140.78
PoliMatch: n/a
|
Posted: Thu 2005-07-07 17:37
|
|
| Politics: Oligarchical Collectivist |
Country: Antarctica |
|
| Just Kidding |
|
Of course, I don't REALLY do those things for the government. I was joking.
And, I guess that technicly, it's not a nation, but the religion of Islam that forbids mistreatment of their holy book because they consider every copy of it to be a holy relic. How do christians and jews feel about it? I mean, has the pope declared it an offence punishable by death to mistreat a bible? And since bishops are holy relics, are we allowed to burn them?
And, what if you're reading a koran and your bitch needs to have the back of her throat massaged with your shlong, so you fold the corner of the page you were reading and put the book down while she services your manhood? Does folding the corner of the page count as desicration? Can you be killed for that? Or would it be better to just continue to read your holy book while you shoot you wad down your Hoe's throat? It seems to me that if a bitch is sucking your dick, the polite thing to do would be to give her your full attention (unless you're busy watching a porno movie). Now THAT"S a delima!
And here's a REAL delima: Say it becomes illegal to desicrate the US flag. I've still got my US flag towel and what if my bitch is a spitter and after I bust a nut in her mouth, she spits my wad onto the towel? Which one of us is guilty of desicration? I mean, she spit it out, but it was my jism. What if I didn't know that she was a spitter? And we were both on the towel while she was blowing me in the first place. Will performing sex acts on the flag be considered desecration? And what if she's on her period and we're having sex while laying on the towel because we don't want to stain the sheets? Is bleeding on the flag while having sex on it going to be considered desecration?
Okay, I'm finished. _________________ You know what is in room 101...Everyone knows. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Therapy Needed
Committee Leader

Post #11948
Joined: 22 Feb 2005
Posts: 552
Total Words: 85,596
Average words per post: 155.07
PoliMatch: n/a
|
Posted: Thu 2005-07-07 18:26
|
|
| Politics: Libertarian-Capitalist |
Country: Ninth Plane of Hell |
|
| |
|
| minister of love wrote: |
| Okay, I'm finished. |
And thank god for that.  _________________ Obey the Dome. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tyrant
Outer Party

Post #11949
Joined: 21 Mar 2005
Posts: 158
Total Words: 11,654
Average words per post: 73.76
PoliMatch: n/a

|
Posted: Thu 2005-07-07 18:27
|
|
| Politics: Libertarian-Capitalist |
Country: Canada |
|
| Gold! |
|
Hahahaha! That was ridiculous- I almost died laughing. Good stuff.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
minister of love
Committee Member

Post #11991
Joined: 22 Feb 2005
Posts: 273
Total Words: 38,433
Average words per post: 140.78
PoliMatch: n/a
|
Posted: Sat 2005-07-09 13:54
|
|
| Politics: Oligarchical Collectivist |
Country: Antarctica |
|
| Re: Gold! |
|
| Tyrant wrote: |
Hahahaha! That was ridiculous- I almost died laughing. Good stuff.  |
I just wanted to lighten things up a bit.  _________________ You know what is in room 101...Everyone knows. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Saf
Prole

Post #12143
Joined: 18 Jul 2005
Posts: 18
Total Words: 1,269
Average words per post: 70.5
PoliMatch: n/a
|
Posted: Tue 2005-07-19 01:10
|
|
| Politics: Fascist |
Country: United States |
|
| |
|
This symbolic act (i.e., flag burning) produces no actual results aside from the destruction of a piece of cloth; the government should have no reason to care about this. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Therapy Needed
Committee Leader

Post #12151
Joined: 22 Feb 2005
Posts: 552
Total Words: 85,596
Average words per post: 155.07
PoliMatch: n/a
|
Posted: Tue 2005-07-19 07:43
|
|
| Politics: Libertarian-Capitalist |
Country: Ninth Plane of Hell |
|
| |
|
| Saf wrote: |
| This symbolic act (i.e., flag burning) produces no actual results aside from the destruction of a piece of cloth; the government should have no reason to care about this. |
Ok, not that I disagree with the conclusion of that argument, but it's far too simplified to say burning a flag is merely a combustive reaction. It causes an emotional response in many, and an intense one many others. Although I can't say this emotional response, even if it produces some negative consequences, is worth the time or money needed to enforce it. _________________ Obey the Dome. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RAK
Minster of Plenty

Post #12155
Joined: 15 May 2004
Posts: 1638
Total Words: 303,587
Average words per post: 185.34
PoliMatch: n/a
   
  
|
Posted: Tue 2005-07-19 11:20
|
 | | |